1. ± Rejection calculated based on cumulative submissions of PVS and iTero scans from Jan 2017 to June 2018. data on file at Align Technology, as of July 2018.
  2. ~ Compared to Invisalign aligners previously made from single-layer (EX30) material. Invisalign aligners made from SmartTrack material provide better fit, better comfort, and are easier to insert and remove compared to Invisalign aligners previously made from single-layer (EX30) material.
  3. X Gu, J et al. Evaluation of Invisalign treatment effectiveness and efficiency compared with conventional fixed appliances using the Peer Assessment Rating index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop February 2017, 151 259-66. Buschang, P et al Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces. Angle Orthodontist, Vol 84, No 3, 2014.
  4. ~ Compared to Invisalign aligners previously made from single-layer (EX30) material. Invisalign aligners made from SmartTrack material provide better fit, better comfort, and are easier to insert and remove compared to Invisalign aligners previously made from single-layer (EX30) material.
  5. ˭ Data on file at Align Technology, as of October, 2020.
  6. ○ Compared to Invisalign aligners previously made from single layer 0.030 inch (EX30) material.
  7. Ѱ Some doctors still take physical impressions using a soft putty. These impressions are then scanned by Invisalign technicians to create the 3D image for use in the ClinCheck software and manufacturing aligners.
  8. ҂ Data on file at Align Technology, as of November 7th, 2018.
  9. ± Rejection calculated based on cumulative submissions of PVS and iTero scans from Jan 2017 to June 2018. data on file at Align Technology, as of July 2018.
  10. ؞ Data on file at Align Technology, as of October 12, 2017.
  11. ⱴ With weekly aligner changes, compared with two-week aligner changes.